[Cover photo: Fabian Hamilton MP hosting report launch in the UK House of Commons]
A new report launched in the UK Parliament today demonstrates how the UK could cancel their plan to replace the Trident nuclear weapons system without massive job losses.
The report, Defence Diversification: International learning for Trident jobs, examines defence diversification and conversion projects around the world and applies this experience to the UK. It concludes that the work skills, jobs, technology and infrastructure of the nuclear weapons industry could be converted or transferred to other sectors of the economy, providing a net benefit to the UK.
‘It is not yet Labour Party policy to scrap Trident,’ says Fabian Hamilton MP, PNND member and Shadow Minister for Peace and Disarmament who hosted the launch event. ‘However, isn’t it better for the UK to shift the skills and industry we have for massive death and destruction to be used instead for enhancing life? I am committed, not only to transitioning away from nuclear weapons, but to protecting jobs at the same time.’
Barnaby Pace, author and researcher for the report, notes that there are many sectors in the civilian economy that could benefit from the skills, technology and resources currently being used in the nuclear weapons industry. These include renewable energy, electronics, engineering and even tourism. However, engagement of all sectors in the industry (workers, management and local communities) is vital to ensure the success of economic conversion plans.
‘When decisions are made, it’s important to protect and prioritise good quality UK jobs and the communities linked to the defence industry,’ said Paul Nowak, Deputy General Secretary of the Trades Union Congress, speaking at the launch. ‘Unions and the workforce should have a say in creating new opportunities for highly skilled workers in defence and other advanced manufacturing and engineering industries.’
The report also highlights that successful conversion to civilian enterprises requires government intervention – not only to protect jobs, but also to persuade the defence industry to diversify and convert. Fabian Hamilton announced that for this reason, a Labour government would re-establish and properly resource a Defence Diversification Agency.
Alyn Ware, Global Coordinator of Parliamentarians for Nuclear Nonproliferation and Disarmament, speaking from the floor, noted that nuclear weapons corporations – and others in the weapons production industry – are hesitant to change even if there is government support and worker agreement, and that other incentives are probably required to convince them to move. This is the reason behind the growing movement for public divestment from the nuclear weapons industry.
The research and report were commissioned by the Nuclear Education Trust. Peter Burt, Nuclear Education Trust Board Trustee concludes that ‘Our independent analysis of international experience of defence diversification tells us that a government needs to be proactive in getting the conditions right for a successful transition from skilled defence jobs to those in the equally skilled, civil sector. Those conditions include complete stakeholder participation including workers and communities, and national, regional and local political support.’